Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129023›Full record

ArticleAnnals of transplantation2025

Family-Related Motivation and Regret Intensity Among Family Liver Donors by Type of Family Relationship.

Ye Sol Lee, Chin Kang Koh, Nam-Joon Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ye Sol LeeDepartment of Nursing, Catholic Kwandong University, Gangneung, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9361-4313
Chin Kang KohCollege of Nursing, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Nam-Joon YiDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5467-425X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) from a family member, particularly adult children, is common in South Korea. Although LDLT is restricted to donors with altruistic motivations, some still experience post-donation regret. However, the role of family-related motivation in post-donation regret remains underexplored. This study examined whether family-related motivations were associated with regret intensity and whether these associations varied by the type of family relationship (child vs spouse, sibling, or parent donors). MATERIAL AND METHODS This study was a cross-sectional secondary analysis. The sample comprised 124 postoperative living liver donors. They completed a family-related motivation subscale of the Donor Motivation Questionnaire and a single-item measure of regret intensity. For moderation analysis, Model 1 of the PROCESS macro was used. RESULTS The mean score of post-donation regret was 1.3 out of 4. Non-child donors reported higher levels of regret than child donors. Particularly in non-child donors, family-related motivation was inversely associated with regret intensity, after adjusting for age, sex, caregiver role, postoperative complications, and months since donation. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that child and non-child donors have distinct motivations, which are linked to differing levels of regret. Accordingly, transplant teams should provide tailored information and support services based on the donor's family relationship type.

Indexed as

EmotionsFamilyFamily RelationsLiver TransplantationLiving DonorsMotivationAdultAltruismCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40129023
PMCPMC11954405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.