ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2025
Questionnaire Survey on the Current Use of Brain Docks and Their Compliance with Guidelines in Japan.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain dock is used for the early diagnosis of intracranial lesions, prevention of cerebrovascular disorders, and early detection of cognitive decline. However, its application varies per facility. This study evaluated the use of brain dock and compliance with its guidelines via a questionnaire survey on the members of the Japan Society of Ningen Dock and Preventive Medical Care and the Japan Brain Dock Society. The questionnaire included information on the respondents, facility characteristics, and brain dock implementation. The number of responses was 288 (response rate: 10.3%). Brain dock was predominantly used in combination with other diagnostic methods. In addition to magnetic resonance imaging, the other examinations performed included the assessment of stroke risk factors and dementia. Radiographic image interpretation was frequently performed by more than one person, often by a neurosurgeon or radiologist. Artificial intelligence was used less frequently. In several facilities, the results were explained to all patients in person and to those who requested the findings in other facilities. Meanwhile, 10% of centers sent the results to the patients. Neurosurgeons were the most common professionals who provided explanations to the patients, followed by outpatient physicians who used the interpretation result as a reference. Only 24% of professionals were aware of the brain dock certification program. By solving the related problems, brain docks can play a greater role in improving medical issues in Japan, where the aging society is projected to increase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.