Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128931›Full record

ArticleMicrobes and environments2025

Impact of Inoculations with Indigenous Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens Isolates on Productivity and Competition with Indigenous Bradyrhizobia in Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis).

Sokichi Shiro, Ryu Makihara, Shota Nakao, Masayuki Kadowaki, Yuichi Saeki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbes and environments, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sokichi ShiroInstitute of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Academic Assembly, Shimane University.
Ryu MakiharaMajor in Agricultural and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Shimane University.
Shota NakaoDepartment of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, Shimane University.
Masayuki KadowakiInstitute of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Academic Assembly, Shimane University.
Yuichi SaekiDepartment of Biochemistry and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We herein exami-ned the inoculation effects of indigenous Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens isolates on the growth and yield of adzuki beans and their competition with other bradyrhizobia using pot and field experiments. In the pot experiment, shoot nitrogen content was significantly higher following inoculations with AMP1 and Bd (a mixture of AN9 and AN20) than with the control. Furthermore, a correlation was observed between shoot nitrogen content and shoot dry weight. In the field experiment, the inoculating isolates did not significantly affect growth or yield. However, an interaction effect was observed in pod numbers and yield, suggesting that the effects of inoculation varied depending on the cultivar and inoculating isolate. In the correlation ana-lysis, pod number correlated with node number and nodule number. Similarly, yield correlated with shoot length, node number, nodule number, and pod number. Regarding competition between inoculated isolates and other strains, B. elkanii was dominant in pot and field experiments. To enhance the yield of adzuki bean through inoculations, it is necessary to overcome competition from indigenous B. elkanii and increase the occupancy rate of B. diazoefficiens isolates.

Indexed as

Agricultural InoculantsBradyrhizobiumVignaNitrogenPlant ShootsRoot Nodules, PlantSymbiosisNitrogenadzuki beancompetitioninoculation effectnitrogen fixation

Identifiers

PMID40128931
PMCPMC11946408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.