Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128915›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2025

Efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicines for allergic rhinitis based on 2020 Chinese Pharmacopoeia: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Weibo Zhao, Lingyao Kong, Xuehui Wang, Qingyuan Liu, Yaqi Wang, Ji Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Weibo ZhaoNational Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine Constitution and Preventive Treatment of Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Lingyao KongCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xuehui WangCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Qingyuan LiuInstitute for TCM-X, Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yaqi WangCollege of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Ji WangNational Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine Constitution and Preventive Treatment of Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China. doctorwang2009@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergic Rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent chronic respiratory condition with limited long-term relief from Western medications. Interest in Traditional Chinese Patent Medicines (TCPMs) as a complementary approach is growing, but research on their efficacy and safety is lacking. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCPMs listed in the 2020 Chinese Pharmacopoeia (ChP 2020) that are indicated for treating AR.

methodsWe will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and four Chinese databases to retrieve randomized controlled trials investigating specific TCPMs (Biyankang tablets, Tongqiao Biyan Granules, Tongqiao Biyan Tablets, Tongqiao Biyan Capsules, Xinqin Granules, Xinqin Tablets, Xinyi Biyan Pills) for AR. Primary outcomes are Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS) and Total Ocular Symptom Scores (TOSS). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, relapse rates, nasal function, biomarkers, and adverse events. No languages and publication data limitations. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan 5.4 with random effects model. Publication bias are set to be assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test, and adjusted with the trim and fill method. Meta-regression will investigate factors influencing outcomes for AR. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to evaluate the quality of evidence. DISCUSSION: Despite the limitations of conventional AR medications, TCPMs show potential benefits in immune modulation and symptom relief. This review will focus on TCPMs listed in ChP 2020 to comprehensively evaluate their safety and efficacy for AR. Unlike existing reviews, this study emphasizes rigorous standards of TCPMs, aiming to provide a more reliable evidence base. Although a network meta-analysis would be ideal, a traditional meta-analysis will be conducted due to limited data. Future research should focus on direct comparative studies and utilize AI techniques for understanding mechanisms and enhancing personalized treatments. This review aims to bridge gaps in the current literature and potentially improve clinical guidelines and patient outcomes in AR management. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: INPLASY202450121.

Indexed as

Drugs, Chinese HerbalMedicine, Chinese TraditionalNonprescription DrugsPharmacopoeias as TopicRhinitis, AllergicHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicDrugs, Chinese HerbalNonprescription Drugs2020 Chinese PharmacopoeiaAllergic rhinitisChinese patent medicinesMeta-analysisProtocolSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40128915
PMCPMC11934513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.