ArticleBMC nursing2025
Action research on implementing the BOPPPS model in teaching mechanical prophylaxis techniques for deep vein thrombosis.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of BOPPPS and flipped classroom teaching models for enhanced learning outcomes in pediatric dentistry education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the application effects of the BOPPPS model in teaching mechanical prophylaxis techniques for deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
methodsFollowing the "Plan-Act-Observe-Reflect" four-step process of action research, continuous improvements were made to the teaching process of DVT mechanical prophylaxis techniques based on the BOPPPS model. Data were collected by designated personnel and the teaching effectiveness was evaluated.
resultsThrough three rounds of action research, the overall practical training scores for DVT mechanical prophylaxis techniques among students from the 2019-2021 cohorts were 84.45 ± 4.75, 88.43 ± 3.92, and 91.15 ± 4.58, respectively. The self-evaluation scores for DVT prophylaxis awareness were 95.93 ± 2.78, 97.39 ± 2.54, and 98.47 ± 2.47, all of which were statistically significant (P < 0.01). Cohen's d effect sizes further confirmed substantial improvements.
conclusionImplementing the BOPPPS model in teaching DVT mechanical prophylaxis techniques helps improve students' knowledge, skills, and prevention awareness. The action research method contributes to the standardization and scientific design of the curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.