Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128867›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Stress, student burnout and study engagement - a cross-sectional comparison of university students of different academic subjects.

Nils Olson, Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz, Barbara Reiner, Thorsten Schulz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nils OlsonTUM School of Medicine and Health, Chair of Preventive Pediatrics, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, Munich, Germany. nils.olson@tum.de.
Renate Oberhoffer-FritzTUM School of Medicine and Health, Chair of Preventive Pediatrics, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, Munich, Germany.
Barbara ReinerTUM School of Medicine and Health, Chair of Preventive Pediatrics, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, Munich, Germany.
Thorsten SchulzTUM School of Medicine and Health, Chair of Preventive Pediatrics, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStress and burnout among students are health concerns in higher education systems, the prevalence of which exceeds that of the working population. Both are associated with impaired health and increased university drop-out rates. Study engagement, a positive study-related attitude characterized by energy, dedication, and absorption, counteracts stress and burnout. Person-oriented approaches can help to ensure students' health and well-being and help to deduce preventive measures and interventions. Nevertheless, most studies treat students as a homogenous group and do not differentiate between academic subjects. Students apart from medical and nursing sciences have been mostly neglected within this research field.

methodsIn a cross-sectional study, a sample of n = 947 students from five academic subject fields (Informatics, Mechanical Engineering, Sports and Health Sciences, Medicine, Economic Sciences) at a university in Germany was analyzed using an online survey. Sociodemographic data, perceived stress, study engagement and student burnout were included.

resultsA total of 73.2% of the students were moderately to highly stressed, with females displaying higher stress levels than males. Almost one-third of the students reported frequent symptoms of burnout, while 44.5% reported a high degree of study engagement, with no differences according to sex. Stress (male: F [4, 401] = 5.321; p < 0.001; female: F [4, 532] = 9.325; p < 0.001), burnout (F [4, 938] = 7.537-11.827; p < 0.001) and engagement (F [4, 938] = 14.426; p < 0.001) were significantly differentiated by faculty affiliation. Medical students had the lowest stress levels, while informatics students had the highest stress levels. The faculty of informatics also had the highest level of burnout symptoms, while medical students and students in sports and health sciences displayed the most beneficial values. Medical students were most engaged, differing significantly from those of all the other faculties.

conclusionsStress and burnout seem to be a problem in all students, especially among students in informatics and engineering. The previous focus on medical students concerning study demands does not seem justified according to our results. Fostering a supportive environment is key for study engagement, health and well-being of students. The inclusion of further individual factors should be a future concern in order to find and promote strategies for a healthy education system.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalBurnout, PsychologicalStress, PsychologicalStudentsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultStressStudent burnoutStudy engagementStudy fieldsUniversity students

Identifiers

PMID40128867
PMCPMC11931745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.