ArticleBMC nursing2025
Examining knowledge, attitudes, and implementation of evidence-based practice among nursing students: a multicenter cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of nurses' attitudes toward evidence-based practices on medical error tendency: a descriptive and correlational study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Nurses experiences of adopting evidence-based practice in Saudi healthcare: organizational, educational, and cultural influences from qualitative focus groups.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Evidence-Based Practice Engagement Among Clinical Dietitians: A Mixed-Methods Study Using the COM-B Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting the adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) based on critical thinking levels among nursing students.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Participatory development of strategies to combat congenital syphilis: action research.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Exploring the learning experiences and optimization pathways of nursing master's students in an Evidence-Based Nursing course: a mixed-methods study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the realm of healthcare, the adoption of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is paramount to ensure the delivery of optimal patient care. Despite its critical significance, disparities persist in the knowledge and skills pertaining to EBP among students.
objectivesThis study aims to assess Saudi nursing students' perceived knowledge, attitudes, and application of EBP, alongside their perceptions of organizational culture and readiness that support EBP implementation.
methodsThe study employed a cross-sectional descriptive correlational design. A convenience sample of 183 undergraduate nursing students was selected from three governmental Saudi universities from June to August 2023. A self-reported, three-part online survey was utilized and included: a demographic questionnaire, the Student Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (S-EBPQ), and the short version of Organizational Culture and Readiness for School-wide Integration of Evidence-based Practice (OCRSIEP-E). Participants were recruited based on specific inclusion criteria, including senior nursing students, recent graduates, and those with research or EBP training.
findingsMost participants demonstrated satisfactory (54.6%) or high (31.7%) knowledge of EBP, while 13.7% reported poor knowledge. In EBP retrieving and reviewing, 48.1% found their skills satisfactory, 32.2% high, and 19.7% poor. For EBP sharing and application, 41% rated their skills as high, 36.1% satisfactory, and 23% poor. Attitudes toward EBP were 64.5% positive and 35.5% negative. Female students had higher knowledge (M = 4.61) than males (M = 3.90; p < 0.01) and higher EBP sharing scores (M = 4.42 vs. M = 3.90; p < 0.05). Research involvement also influenced knowledge (M = 4.54 vs. M = 4.08; p < 0.05) and EBP sharing (M = 4.43 vs. M = 3.88; p < 0.05). Students' perceptions of organizational support varied, with mean scores of 3.49 for culture-supporting culture, 3.59 for resources availability, and 3.47 for mentorship support.
conclusionThe study reveals generally positive EBP knowledge and attitudes among nursing students but highlights significant gaps in critical skills such as retrieving, reviewing, and applying evidence, as well as inconsistencies in organizational support. Institutions can address these gaps by integrating structured EBP training, mentorship programs, research engagement opportunities, and enhanced faculty support to foster a stronger evidence-based practice culture. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.