ArticleBMC psychology2025
Psychometric properties and Turkish adaptation of the artificial intelligence attitude scale (AIAS-4): evidence for construct validity.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and psychometric analysis of 5-item Artificial Intelligence Attitude (AIAT-5) for students.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence: AI literacy as a predictor and the mediating effect of AI anxiety.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Psychometric evaluation of an instrument measuring artificial intelligence utilization in decision-making domains of healthcare organizations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) attitude scales can be used to better evaluate the benefit and drawback cons of AI. This article consists of two different studies examining attitudes towards AI. In Study I (N = 370), the four-item Artificial Intelligence Attitude Scale-4 (AIAS-4) has a one-dimensional structure as a result of confirmatory factor analysis and the fit index values are at an acceptable level [Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.991; Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.989; Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.988; Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.973; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.018]. Additionally, according to the results of the item response analysis conducted to support construct validity at this stage, the scale items have sufficient discrimination (discrimination value range = 2.22-3.80). Later, measurement invariance analysis revealed that the scale measured the same construct in females and males. In Study II (N = 331), the reliability of AIAS-4 was reached by calculating different reliability coefficients. Then, AI attitude was found to be associated with depression, anxiety, and stress, as well as mental health variables such as mental wellbeing and flourishing. Moreover, openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, and neuroticism are significantly related to an AI attitude. Lastly, psychological distress has a significant mediating role in the relationship between AI attitude and mental health. The findings of this pioneering research on AI attitudes were discussed and interpreted in light of the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.