Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128803›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

Management of traumatic spinal cord injury in the Nordic countries: a multidisciplinary survey.

Anders C Feyling, Johan Undén, Niklas Marklund, Ilke Malak, Ramona Åstrand, Jussi P Posti, Tor Brommeland

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anders C FeylingDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Division of Emergencies & Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway. anders.feyling@gmail.com.
Johan UndénDepartment of Operation and Intensive Care, Hallands Hospital Halmstad, Halmstad, Sweden.
Niklas MarklundDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurosurgery, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. niklas.marklund@med.lu.se.
Ilke MalakDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallands Hospital Halmstad, Halmstad, Sweden.
Ramona ÅstrandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jussi P PostiNeurocenter, Department of Neurosurgery and Turku Brain Injury Center, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Tor BrommelandNeurosurgical department, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of traumatic spinal cord injury is complex and depends on a multidisciplinary approach involving pre-hospital services, spinal surgery, intensive care unit treatment and specialized rehabilitation. International clinical practice guidelines for the handling of these patients offer specific recommendations regarding transportation, radiological investigations, timing of surgery, intensive care management and rehabilitation. We performed a comprehensive multicenter survey to assess the agreement between the Nordic countries on the different aspects of traumatic spinal cord injury management.

methodsSequential, cross-sectional, structured survey comprising the key clinical domains (pre-hospital services, spinal surgery, intensive care management and rehabilitation) in all tertiary spine trauma centers in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Iceland and Finland. Data are presented descriptively.

resultsA total of 109 respondents from 22 Nordic centers were invited to take the survey, with a response rate of 90% (98/109). Overall, clinical practices were comparable within the domains. Prehospital services had similar practices for airway management, clinical spine clearance and patient transport. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was available to 33/35 of the spine surgeons (94%) on a 24/7 basis. This examination was considered mandatory prior to surgery by 66% (23/35) of the surgeons. Surgery was defined as early if performed within 24 h of the injury by all surveyed surgeons. Augmented blood pressure regimens were widely applied in the intensive care units, with mean arterial pressure targets varying between > 80 and > 90 mmHg. Postoperative thromboprophylaxis was administered within 48 h by all centers and rehabilitation policies were similar overall. Notable variations in practice were the occasional steroid administration and the use of lumbar drains in 54% (14/26) of intensive care units.

conclusionAlthough there is some variability in the current management of traumatic spinal cord injury in the Nordic countries at the center- and country-level, practices in most key clinical domains are similar and follow established international guidelines.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Medical ServicesHumansScandinavian and Nordic CountriesSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical managementSpinal cord injurySurvey

Identifiers

PMID40128803
PMCPMC11934776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.