ArticleBMC health services research2025
Functionality and performance of COVID-19 taskforces in response to the pandemic in Uganda.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn response to increasing COVID-19 community transmission in 2020, the Government of Uganda established the National Community Engagement Strategy. As part of this strategy, COVID-19 taskforces were recommended in response to the pandemic. However, the extent to which these taskforces supported their communities during the pandemic is not clear. This study assessed the functionality, performance and contribution of the COVID-19 taskforces to response to the pandemic in Uganda.
methodsA qualitative study was carried out that also involved functionality assessment of COVID-19 taskforces in 5 districts of Amuria, Karenga, Kamwenge, Bugiri and Pader. Twenty key informant interviews were conducted at national, district and community levels to gain insights on the COVID-19 taskforces. The data were analyzed by thematic analysis using the inductive approach with the support of NVivo version 12 pro (QSR International).
resultsCOVID-19 taskforces were created at national, district and village levels. Composition, surveillance and communication functions of COVID-19 village taskforce were best scored. A key feature of the COVID-19 taskforces was their multi-disciplinary and inter-sectoral composition. Coordination between the different taskforce levels particularly village, sub-county and district had gaps in communication and sharing of information. Parish level COVID-19 taskforces were either not functional or nonexistent. COVID-19 taskforces played different roles in response to the pandemic. At district level, the taskforces performed a more coordination role, mainly supporting planning and resource mobilization. However, the village taskforces were primarily engaged in interpersonal communication, awareness creation, and community mobilization for interventions including observing the standard operating procedures for controlling the pandemic.
conclusionThe COVID-19 taskforces at decentralized government levels supported the response to the pandemic. These taskforces could be strengthened and utilized during response to future outbreaks across the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.