ArticleBMC public health2025
Association of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the general population: insights from NHANES 1999-2018.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- HDL and ASCVD: is high HDL-C protective, harmful, or simply misleading?Current opinion in lipidology · 2026Review
- The Complex Relationship Between HDL/LDL Cholesterol, Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ABCA1-Mediated Structural Diversity of HDL Subspecies and Their Proposed Roles in Cardioprotection.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026Review
- Impact of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol on cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: a large-scale cohort study in Korea.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have shown that extremely high levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol are paradoxically associated with adverse outcomes in certain clinical settings. We aimed to test the hypothesis that extremely high levels of HDL cholesterol are associated with increased all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the general population.
methodsWe included 51,235 individuals from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999 to 2018 with a median follow-up of 9.3 years. Baseline HDL cholesterol levels were measured, and mortality data were ascertained from National Death Index (NDI) records through December 31, 2019. Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression, restricted cubic spline curves, and cumulative incidence analyses were performed.
resultsA U-shaped association was observed between HDL cholesterol levels and all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in the general population. Compared with individuals with HDL cholesterol levels between 50 and 59 mg/dL, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) for those with extremely high HDL cholesterol levels (≥ 80 mg/dL) were 1.24 (1.08-1.43), 1.18 (1.03-1.36) and 1.27 (1.09-1.49) for all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, respectively. Similar U-shaped patterns were replicated in both men and women. Further analyses of cause-specific mortality subcategories showed that extremely high HDL cholesterol levels were also associated with increased mortality from heart disease, respiratory disease, endocrine disease, and cancer.
conclusionExtremely high levels of HDL cholesterol were associated with an increased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular mortality in the general population. Future studies should investigate the causal factors leading to the association of elevated HDL cholesterol and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.