Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128713›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Accuracy of tongue strength, endurance, and pressure using Iowa oral performance instrument and predictors of dysphagia in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study.

Yen-Fang Chou, Chien-Mei Sung, Yu-Hao Chu, Kai-Jo Chiang, Ruey Chen, Kondwani Joseph Banda, Chiu-Kuei Lee, Melati Fajarini, Kuei-Ru Chou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yen-Fang ChouSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No.250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chien-Mei SungDepartment of Nursing, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yu-Hao ChuSchool of Nutrition and Health Sciences, College of Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kai-Jo ChiangSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No.250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ruey ChenSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No.250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kondwani Joseph BandaSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No.250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chiu-Kuei LeeSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No.250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, Taiwan.
Melati FajariniSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No.250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kuei-Ru ChouSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No.250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, Taiwan. kueiru@tmu.edu.tw.

Funding

Chang Gung Medical Foundation through Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Research Program CMRPG5M0031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecreased tongue strength, pressure, and endurance are key indicators in determining oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). This study aimed to examine the accuracy of the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) in assessing tongue strength, endurance, and pressure, and to identify predictors of OD.

methodsIn this study, we analyzed data of community-dwelling older adults (age ≥ 65 years) collected between March to December 2022. The accuracy for IOPI was examined with Receiver operating characteristic curve using area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) and optimal cutoff with Youden index (J). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictors of OD were performed presenting odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsThe cohort consisted of 85 older adults with mean age of 83.25 years (SD 6.76), of which 64 (75.3%) were female. The prevalence of OD using EAT-10 was 8.3%. Tongue strength demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy using anterior tongue strength (ATS): cut-off: 37.5 kPa (AUC: 0.79, Se: 0.86, and Sp: 0.65) and posterior tongue strength: cut-off: 31.5 kPa (AUC: 0.73, Se: 0.71, and Sp: 0.79). Tongue endurance demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy using anterior endurance target second (ATE-Target Sec): cut-off: 2.4 (AUC: 0.96, Se: 0.86, and Sp: 0.90), PTE-Target Sec: cut-off: 1.7 (AUC: 0.93, Se: 0.86, and Sp: 0.83), ATE-Target Max with cut-off: 34.4 kPa (AUC 0.81, Se = 0.86, and Sp = 0.64), and PTE-Target Max with cut-off: 29.5 kPa (AUC: 0.77, Se = 0.86, and Sp = 0.69). Tongue pressure revealed limited diagnostic accuracy using saliva swallowing pressure with cut-off: 23.3 kPa (AUC: 0.60) and effortful swallowing pressure with cut-off: 28.5 kPa (AUC: 0.62). Significant predictors for OD were frailty (3.02, 95%CI: 1.56-5.88), age (1.17, 95%CI: 1.01-1.35), nutritional status (0.72, 95%CI: 0.57-0.92), ATS (0.86, 95%CI: 0.77-0.97), ATE-Target Max (0.90, 95%CI: 0.84-0.97), PTE-Target Max (0.92, 95%CI: 0.86-0.99), ADL (0.91), IADL (0.67), and depression (1.32).

conclusionsThe findings suggest that tongue strength and endurance, measured by IOPI, are more effective parameters than tongue pressure, with frailty, age, nutritional status, ATS, ATE-Target Max, PTE-Target Max, ADL, IADL, and depression being essential for early screening of OD in community-dwelling older adults. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersIndependent LivingMuscle StrengthPhysical EnduranceTongueAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePressureAccuracyCommunity-dwelling older adultsIowa oral performance instrumentOropharyngeal dysphagia

Identifiers

PMID40128713
PMCPMC11931766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.