ArticleBMC public health2025
The impact of sugar-sweetened beverages consumption on constipation: evidence from NHANES.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has increased substantially over recent decades, raising concerns about its various physiological effects on bodily function. However, the relationship between SSBs intake and constipation remains insufficiently understood.
methodsData from 7,979 participants sourced from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analyzed in this study. Dietary intake of SSBs was assessed using two 24-hour dietary recall interviews, and constipation was defined according to the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) Cards. We employed weighted logistic regression analysis to examine the relationship between SSBs consumption (quantified in grams and kilocalories) and the risk of constipation, while stratified and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses explored population variability.
resultsAfter adjusting for all relevant variables, SSBs quantified in grams (SSBs-grams) (OR
conclusionsOur findings indicated that increased SSBs consumption is associated with a higher risk of constipation. The results underscore the need for public health interventions aimed at reducing the intake of SSBs and promoting healthier alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.