ArticleBMC health services research2025
Putting people at the center: methods for patient journey mapping of viral hepatitis services across two LMICs in the Asia Pacific.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Qualitative Patient Journey Map of the Ophthalmic Day-Surgery Experience.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Construction and practice of a four-dimensional integrated one-stop outpatient service model based on patient journey mapping.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Mapping the journey: enhancing abortion care in Uganda's health systems.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
- Indonesian Patients' Experiences and Emotional Attachment to Healthcare Services Abroad: A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo ensure that health services are high-quality, trusted and used by the population, their design and improvement should start from the perspective of what matters to people. Patient journey mapping (PJM) is one research method that centers the experiences of individuals living with health conditions and follows their pathways through care and recovery. This paper describes a novel, qualitative PJM methodology used in Vietnam and the Philippines to inform the co-design of a people-centered viral hepatitis screening, care and treatment pathway for individuals living with chronic hepatitis, which is a significant public health concern in the Asia-Pacific region.
methodsData collection involved in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 63 people living with hepatitis (demand-side) and focus group discussions with healthcare providers working in the same geographical areas (supply-side). Rapid deductive qualitative analysis was used to identify typical journeys, and related barriers and enablers. The methodology was implemented over 8 weeks, adapting the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
resultsThis paper demonstrates how a PJM methodology that incorporates patient and HCP perspectives can be feasibly implemented in two LMIC contexts, while fulfilling many of the criteria identified by the COREQ guidelines. Sharing such methods and associated instruments may help to enable broader uptake and application in other LMIC settings, providing health systems practitioners with a critical tool to identify and overcome barriers in and promote the delivery of people-centered health services globally.
conclusionDespite limited uptake, especially in resource-limited contexts and at the primary healthcare level, PJM is a novel research method with the potential to make promising contributions to people-centered health service design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.