ArticleBMC genomics2025
Identifying cross-tissue molecular targets of lung function by multi-omics integration analysis from DNA methylation and gene expression of diverse human tissues.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have reported several genetic loci associated with lung function. However, the mediating mechanism between these genetic loci and lung function phenotype is rarely explored. In this research, we used a cross-tissue multi-omics post-GWAS analysis to explain the associations between DNA methylation, gene expression, and lung function.
methodsWe conducted integration analyses of lung function traits using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data alongside expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) and DNA methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTLs) derived from whole blood, utilizing multi-omics SMR and Bayesian colocalization analysis. Considering the genetic differences of tissues, we replicated the shared causal signals of eQTLs and lung function in 48 diverse tissues and the shared causal signals of mQTLs and lung function in 8 diverse tissues. Multi-trait colocalization analyses were utilized to identify the causal signals between gene expression in blood, blood cell traits, and lung function, as well as between cross-tissue gene expression in diverse tissues and lung function.
resultsEight genes from blood tissue were prioritized as FEV1 causal genes using multi-omics SMR analysis and COLOC colocalization analysis: EML3, UBXN2A, ROM1, ZBTB38, RASGRP3, FAIM, PABPC4, and SNIP1. Equally, five genes (CD46, EML3, UBXN2A, ZBTB38, and LMCD1) were prioritized as FVC causal genes and one gene (LMCD1) was prioritized as FEV1/FVC causal genes. The causal signals between 8 genes (EML3, ROM1, UBXN2A, ZBTB38, RASGRP3, FAIM, PABPC4, and CD46) and lung function were successfully replicated in diverse tissues. More importantly, MOLCO colocalization analysis showed that 3 genes (CD46, LMCD1, and ZBTB38) expression in blood, blood cell traits, and lung function traits shared the same causal signals. Finally, through cross-tissue colocalization analysis of multiple traits, we found that the heart-lung axis EML3 expressions and lung function mediate the same causal signal.
conclusionThis study identified potential cross-tissue molecular targets associated with lung function traits from DNA methylation and gene expression of diverse tissues and explored the probable regulation mechanism of these molecular targets. This provides multi-omics and cross-tissue evidence for the molecular regulation mechanism of lung function and may provide new insight into the influence of crosstalk between organs and tissues on lung function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.