ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2025
Perceptions, Causes and Treatment of Severe Acute Malnutrition, Mbuji-Mayi, Kasai-Oriental, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of Psychomotor Developmental Delay Among Under-Five Children With Severe Acute Malnutrition in a Food Insecure Setting in DRC: Exploratory Analysis of Children From EfRAMAS Trial.Maternal & child nutrition · 2026Article
- Acceptability of a reduced dose of therapeutic food in the management of severely acutely malnourished children aged 6-59 months in Mbuji-Mayi, Democratic Republic of Congo.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Structural equation analysis of rural communities in South Africa and Nigeria: social determinants of health, nutritional deficiencies, and perceived HIV symptoms.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The case for computational and artificial intelligence-based approaches for sustainable functional food systems for sub-Saharan Africa.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effective management of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is contingent upon the perceptions of the affected communities, and preferred therapeutic pathways, object of the present research. A qualitative survey collected 54 semistructured individual interviews, 10 focus groups, and 6 direct observations in Mbujimayi town, Kasaï Oriental province, Democratic Republic of Congo. The deductive approach was used to analyse the data. Cultural and religious beliefs, as well as lived experience, influence perceptions of SAM. The latter is perceived as a shameful disease, a curse, or divine punishment by communities. Food insecurity and poverty following the bankruptcy of Bakwanga diamond Mining (MIBA), then food taboos, women's heavy workloads, poor childcare practices, low birth spacing and lack of access to drinking water were the main causes perceived. Traditional healers are the primary source of care and consider SAM resulting from curses or witchcraft, needing special preparations. Religious leaders regard SAM as a spiritual illness requiring prayers even if modern medicine is administered. Some families turn to prayer, hoping for a therapeutic convocation of the sacred, or self-medication. Modern medicine is the final recourse, frequently combined with the other modalities. For health workers, SAM is linked to nutritional and socioeconomic factors which must be addressed with modern medicine including RUTF. Community awareness and access to education for women is needed to change perceptions. Nutrition programmes would benefit of co-designing their communication and behaviour change strategies with key influential community members of therapeutic pathways of children suffering from SAM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.