ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2025
In Pursuit of Quantifying Patient Knee Contact Mechanics: Finite Element Model Validation of Cadaveric Knees in Axially Loaded MRI Scans.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Meniscal Dominant Loaders During Simulated Gait: A Cadaveric Study in Human Knees.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- [Biomechanical study on the combined effects of femoral component rotational malalignment and osteoporosis in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our long-term objective is to quantify patient-specific changes in contact mechanics after partial meniscectomy (PM) using knee-specific finite element (FE) models created from clinical MR scans under axial load. Before creating patient-specific models, a validation of our workflow and processes is required. The objective of this study was to validate knee-specific FE models of tibiofemoral joint contact mechanics by comparison to direct measurements of contact by electronic pressure sensors. We hypothesized that knee-specific FE model data would fall within direct measurements of the contact area and pressure values from sensors, but that detected differences in outcomes would be smaller than differences reported after PM. The workflow consisted of performing MRIs on five cadaveric knees using a patient-based loading system adapted to cadaveric knees where loaded and unloaded scans were acquired with and without a sensor in place, segmenting images to develop FE models, running those models with statistical approaches to model material property variation and comparing the model outputs to the outputs quantified physically by sensors. Overall, 53% of outcomes (32/60) from the FE models fell within the ranges of those directly measured. Of the values that fell outside, differences were lower than those identified from a literature review of the mechanical effects of partial meniscectomies, especially when meniscectomies were 30% or 60% of the meniscus volume. FE models developed using this workflow may be helpful in assessing or anticipating changes in joint force redistribution following partial meniscectomies in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.