Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128572›Full record

ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2025

The costs and benefits of a prison needle and syringe program in Australia, 2025-30: a modelling study.

Farah Houdroge, Samantha Colledge-Frisby, Nadine Kronfli, Rebecca J Winter, Joanne Carson, Mark Stoove, Nick Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cost-benefit analysis of Canada's Prison Needle Exchange Program for the prevention of hepatitis C and injection-related infections.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Farah HoudrogeThe Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0002-7614-4997
Samantha Colledge-FrisbyThe Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC.
Nadine KronfliMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Rebecca J WinterThe Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0002-2067-4278
Joanne CarsonThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.ORCID 0000-0001-8043-0200
Mark StooveThe Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC.
Nick ScottThe Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC.

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé Junior 2National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2009408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate and compare the costs and benefits of introducing a prison needle and syringe program in all Australian prisons. STUDY

designStochastic compartmental modelling study.

settingAll Australian prisons, 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2030.

interventionIntroduction of a prison needle and syringe program in all Australian prisons during 1 January 2025 - 1 January 2027, with the aim of covering 50% of people who inject drugs in prison by 1 January 2030.

main outcome measuresProjected new hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections and hospitalisations with injection-related bacterial and fungal infections in prisons, with and without the needle and syringe program; costs of the program; savings in treatment costs for HCV and injection-related bacterial and fungal infections; benefit-cost ratio of the program.

resultsIn the base scenario (no prison needle and syringe program), the projected number of new HCV infections during 2025-2030 was 2932 (uncertainty interval [UI], 2394-3507) and the projected number of hospitalisations with injection-related bacterial and fungal infections was 3110 (UI, 2596-3654). With the prison needle and syringe program, it was projected that 894 (UI 880-912) new HCV infections (30%; UI, 26-37%) and 522 (UI, 509-532) hospitalisations with injection-related bacterial and fungal infections (17%; UI, 15-20%) would be averted; the incidence of new HCV infections would be reduced from 3.1 (UI, 2.5-3.7) to 1.3 (UI, 1.0-1.7) per 100 person-years among people who inject drugs in prison. The estimated cost of the program was $12.2 million (UI, $7.6-22.2 million), and the saved care costs for HCV and injection-related infections were $31.7 million (UI, $29.3-34.6 million), yielding a benefit-cost ratio of 2.6 (UI, 1.4-4.1). The benefit-cost ratio was also greater than one for scenarios in which the assumptions and base values for several parameters were varied.

conclusionsEach dollar spent on a needle and syringe program in Australian prisons could save $2.60 in treatment costs for HCV and other injection-related infections.

Indexed as

Hepatitis CNeedle-Exchange ProgramsPrisonsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAustraliaBacterial InfectionsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMycosesCost‐benefit analysisHepatitisintravenousPrisonSubstance abuseviral

Identifiers

PMID40128572
PMCPMC12050243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.