Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128567›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An automated classification pipeline for tables in pharmacokinetic literature.

Victoria C Smith, Ferran Gonzalez Hernandez, Thanaporn Wattanakul, Palang Chotsiri, José Antonio Cordero, Maria Rosa Ballester, Màrius Duran, Olga Fanlo Escudero, Watjana Lilaonitkul, Joseph F Standing and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AutoPK: Leveraging LLMs and a Hybrid Similarity Metric for Advanced Retrieval of Pharmacokinetic Data from Complex Tables and Documents.International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence : [proceedings]. International Conference on Tools for Artificial Intelligence · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Victoria C SmithInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK. v.smith.20@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8629-0875
Ferran Gonzalez HernandezDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7184-7557
Thanaporn WattanakulMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Palang ChotsiriClinical Pharmacology, Modelling and Simulation, Parexel International, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3839-9777
José Antonio CorderoBlanquerna School of Health Sciences, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Rosa BallesterBlanquerna School of Health Sciences, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Màrius DuranBlanquerna School of Health Sciences, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Olga Fanlo EscuderoBlanquerna School of Health Sciences, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Watjana LilaonitkulGlobal Business School for Health, University College London, London, UK.
Joseph F StandingGreat Ormond Street Institute for Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Frank KloproggeInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic (PK) models are essential for optimising drug candidate selection and dosing regimens in drug development. Preclinical and population PK models benefit from integrating prior knowledge from existing compounds. While tables in scientific literature contain comprehensive prior PK data and critical contextual information, the lack of automated extraction tools forces researchers to manually curate datasets, limiting efficiency and scalability. This study addresses this gap by focusing on the crucial first step of PK table mining: automatically identifying tables containing in vivo PK parameters and study population characteristics. To this end, an expert-annotated corpus of 2640 tables from PK literature was developed and used to train a supervised classification pipeline. The pipeline integrates diverse table features and representations, with GPT-4 refining predictions in uncertain cases. The resulting model achieved F1 scores exceeding 96% across all classes. The pipeline was applied to PK papers from PubMed Central Open-Access, with results integrated into the PK paper search tool at www.pkpdai.com . This work establishes a foundational step towards automating PK table data extraction and streamlining dataset curation. The corpus and code are openly available.

Indexed as

Data MiningPharmacokineticsHumansModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID40128567
PMCPMC11933424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.