Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128510›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025

Predictive power of artificial intelligence for malignant cerebral edema in stroke patients: a CT-based systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and diagnostic performance.

Arezoo Shafieioun, Hossein Ghaffari, Mansoureh Baradaran, Amirhossein Rigi, Mohammad Shahir Eftekhar, Farzaneh Shojaeshafiei, Mohammad Amir Korani, Bahareh Hatami, Shabnam Shirdel, Kimia Ghanbari and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Arezoo ShafieiounRasa Medical Imaging and Therapy Center, Isfahan, Iran.
Hossein GhaffariFaculty of Medicine, Organ Transplant Super-Speciality Montaseriyeh Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mansoureh BaradaranDepartment of Radiology, Imam Ali Hospital, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.
Amirhossein RigiDepartment of Radiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Shahir EftekharDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Farzaneh ShojaeshafieiDepartment of Radiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Amir KoraniDepartment of Radiology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Bahareh HatamiDepartment of Radiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shabnam ShirdelDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Kimia GhanbariDepartment of Neurology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Salar GhaderiResearch Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Iranian EBM Centre: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Pegah Moharrami YeganehSchool of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Ramin ShahidiSchool of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Moallem St, Bushehr County, Bushehr, 75146-33341, Iran. dr.raminshahidi1@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant cerebral edema (MCE) is a severe complication of acute ischemic stroke, with high mortality rates. Early and accurate prediction of MCE is critical for initiating timely interventions such as decompressive hemicraniectomy. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics have emerged as promising tools for predicting MCE, offering the potential to transform reactive stroke management into proactive care. However, variability in methodologies and inconsistent reporting limits the widespread adoption of these technologies. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus identified studies reporting on the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of AI models in MCE prediction. Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analyses. Subgroup analyses explored the impact of study design, machine learning input type, and other key factors on diagnostic accuracy. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plot analyses. Data from ten studies encompassing 1,594 unique stroke patients were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AI models for predicting MCE were 81.1% (95% CI: 73.0-87.2%) and 92.6% (95% CI: 91.2-93.9%), respectively, with an AUC of 0.939. The diagnostic odds ratio was 43.73 (95% CI: 24.78-77.15), demonstrating excellent discriminative ability. Subgroup analyses revealed higher sensitivity and specificity in prospective studies (92.0% and 93.3%) compared to retrospective studies (76.1% and 91.4%). Radiomics-based models showed slightly higher sensitivity (84.2%) compared to non-radiomics models (80.4%), though both input types achieved comparable specificity. Interestingly, patients undergoing revascularization had a higher prevalence of MCE, likely due to their more severe initial presentations. Minimal heterogeneity was observed in specificity across studies, while publication bias was noted for sensitivity estimates. AI models show excellent diagnostic performance for predicting malignant cerebral edema (MCE), offering high sensitivity and specificity. Prospective studies, radiomics integration, and multi-center collaborations enhance their accuracy. However, external validation and standardized methodologies are needed to ensure broader clinical adoption and improve outcomes for stroke patients at risk of MCE. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBrain EdemaStrokeTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrevalenceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMalignant cerebral edemaRadiomicsStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.