ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Deep Learning-Assisted Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Using the DenseNet-121 Model: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The quintessential high-risk profile: advanced management strategies for placenta accreta spectrum in patients with advanced maternal age and IVF conception.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the diagnostic value of deep learning (DL) imaging based on MRI in predicting placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in high-risk pregnant women. A total of 263 patients with suspected placenta accreta from Institution I and Institution II were retrospectively analyzed and divided into training (n = 170) and external verification sets (n = 93). Through imaging acquisition, feature extraction, and radiomic data processing, 15 radiomic features were used to train support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and DL models to predict PAS. The diagnostic performances of the models were evaluated in the training set using the area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy and further validated in the external verification set. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a history of cesarean section, placental thickness, and placenta previa were independent clinical risk factors for predicting PAS. Among machine learning (ML) models, SVM demonstrated the highest diagnostic power (AUC = 0.944), with an accuracy of 0.876. The diagnostic efficiency of the DL model was significantly better than that of other models, with an AUC of 0.956 (95% CI 0.931-0.981) in the training set and 0.863 (95% CI 0.816-0.910) in the external verification set. In terms of specificity, the DL model outperformed the ML models. The DL model based on MRI may demonstrate better performance in the diagnosis of PAS compared to traditional clinical models or ML radiomics models, as further confirmed by the external verification set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.