ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Federated Learning Framework for Brain Tumor Detection Using MRI Images in Non-IID Data Distributions.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Byzantine robust federated learning for heterogeneous brain MRI using multisignal gradient fingerprinting and adaptive trust aggregation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- HAMNet: Hierarchical Multi-scale Attention Network for precise disease detection in pearl millet using spatial fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research hotspots and trend of the heart-brain axis by MRI: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Efficient hybrid fuzzy weighted 3D FCNN with TSO PSO optimization for accurate multi modal MRI brain tumor classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumor detection from medical images, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, is a critical task in early diagnosis and treatment planning. Traditional machine learning approaches often rely on centralized data, raising concerns about data privacy, security, and the difficulty of obtaining large annotated datasets. Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution for training models across decentralized devices while maintaining data privacy. However, challenges remain in dealing with non-IID (independent and identically distributed) data, which is common in real-world scenarios. In this research, we used a client-server-based federated learning framework for brain tumor detection using MRI images, leveraging VGG19 as the backbone model. To improve clinical relevance and model interpretability, we have included explainability techniques, particularly Grad-CAM. We trained our model across four clients with non-IID data distribution to simulate real-world conditions. For performance evaluation, we used a centralized test dataset, consisting of 20% of the original data, with the test set used collectively for evaluating model performance after completing federated learning rounds. Using a separate test dataset ensures that all models are evaluated on the same data, making comparisons fair. Since the test dataset is not part of the FL training process, it does not violate the privacy-preserving nature of FL. The experimental results demonstrate that the VGG19 model achieves a high test accuracy of 97.18% (FedAVG), 98.24% (FedProx), and 98.45% (Scaffold) than other state-of-the-art models, showcasing the effectiveness of federated learning in handling distributed and non-IID data. Our findings highlight the potential of federated learning to address privacy concerns in medical image analysis while maintaining high performance even in non-IID settings. This approach provides a promising direction for future research in privacy-preserving AI for healthcare applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.