ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
EMG-Informed Neuromusculoskeletal Simulations Increase the Accuracy of the Estimation of Knee Joint Contact Forces During Sub-optimal Level Walking.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the effect of different neural strategies on the knee joint contact forces during walking in adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ankle Exoskeleton Assistance Reduces Knee Contact Force During Walking in Individuals With Cerebral Palsy.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
- Evidence-informed methodological approaches for coupled neuromusculoskeletal-finite element analysis workflows in orthopaedic biomechanics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- The effect of walking speed on spinal loads and trunk muscle forces using subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling: A database for clinical and modeling applications.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePersonalized musculoskeletal models are crucial to get insights into the mechanisms underpinning neuromusculoskeletal disorders and have the potential to support clinicians in the daily management and evaluation of patients. However, their use is still limited due to the lack of validation studies, which hinders people's trust in these technologies. The current study aims to assess the predictive accuracy of two common approaches to estimate knee joint contact forces, when employing musculoskeletal models.
methodsSubject-specific musculoskeletal models were developed for four elderly subjects, exploiting the freely accessible Knee Grand Challenge datasets, and used to perform biomechanical simulations of level walking to estimate knee joint contact forces. The classical static optimization and EMG-assisted approaches were implemented to resolve the muscle redundancy problem. Their estimates were compared, in terms of predictive accuracy, against the experimental recordings from an instrumented knee implant and against one another. Spatiotemporal differences were identified through Statistical Parametrical Mapping, to complement traditional similarity metrics (R
resultsBoth methods allowed to estimate the experimental knee joint contact forces experienced during walking with a high level of accuracy (R
conclusionWhile the static optimization approach provides reasonable estimates for subjects exhibiting typical gait, the EMG-assisted approach should be preferred and employed when studying clinical populations or patients exhibiting abnormal walking patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.