ArticleEye (London, England)2025
Spectrum of presentation of intraocular metastases from cutaneous melanoma in the era of immunotherapy and targeted therapies.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acral lentiginous melanoma metastases to the vitreous masquerading as uveitis: A case report.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
- Intraocular Metastasis: Differential Diagnosis and Management.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntraocular metastases from cutaneous melanoma are rare. Diagnosis can be challenging and there is currently no consensus on treatment. However, with the increasing incidence of this cancer and improved survival of patients treated with targeted BRAF-MEK inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors, it is likely that more cases will be referred to ocular oncology clinics. SUBJECTS: Single-centre retrospective study. We included all the patients diagnosed with intraocular metastases from cutaneous melanoma seen between 2017 and 2022.
resultsThe first patient had bilateral choroidal metastases and unilateral vitreous cells (treated with external beam radiotherapy and immunotherapy), the second had unilateral amelanotic vitreous metastasis (treated with vitrectomy and BRAF-MEK inhibitors) and the third had bilateral multifocal choroidal metastases (treated with BRAK-MEK inhibitors followed by immunotherapy). The fourth patient (previously reported) had unilateral anterior segment and vitreous metastases (treated with immunotherapy and enucleation). Interestingly, two patients had a history of uveitis in the affected eye, unrelated to the ocular metastases. All four patients had synchronous systemic metastases.
conclusionsThe diagnosis of intraocular metastases from cutaneous melanoma is generally clinical but it is sometimes challenging because of possible masquerade syndromes. The presence of other extraocular metastatic sites is an indicator of the diagnosis. Cytopathologic proof combined with genetic analysis is sometimes necessary for diagnosis, especially with amelanotic vitreous debris or in rare cases where systemic screening is negative. New treatments with targeted BRAF-MEK inhibitors and checkpoint inhibition may avoid external beam radiotherapy and enucleation in some patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.