ArticleScientific reports2025
The distribution and the relationship of HPV subtypes infection with pregnancy outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Human Papillomavirus Infection on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanomedicine in maternal viral infections: advancing prenatal therapies for fetal protection.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Integrating microbiome insights into cervical cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- High-risk HPV infection and the risk of preterm birth in a Romanian tertiary maternity cohort: a prospective observational study.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a significant public health concern, particularly during pregnancy. The impact of HPV infection during pregnancy on maternal and child health is a growing concern. However, research on infection rate and pregnancy outcomes of nine-valent vaccine-covered and non-covered high-risk HPV subtypes during pregnancy remains limited. A retrospective cohort study involved 7110 pregnant women who underwent HPV testing in Fujian Provincial Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (FMCH) from January 2021 to December 2022. Multiple logistic regression analyses investigated the association between HPV infections and maternal and neonatal outcomes. The study identified that the overall HPV infection rate in pregnant women was 19.9%. The HPV types 52, 16, 58, 42, and 51 were the most common among the participants. Infections with nine-valent HPV vaccine-covered high-risk subtypes significantly increased the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (OR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.08-1.55) and cesarean section (OR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.06-1.49). Co-infections with both nine-valent vaccine-covered and non-covered high-risk HPV subtypes elevated the risks of cesarean section (OR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.11-2.27) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR = 2.73; 95% CI: 1.44-5.15). Additionally, these infections significantly increased the risk of small for gestational age (SGA) infants, with the group IV (OR = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.21-3.54) having a higher risk than the group III (OR = 1.33; 95% CI: 0.17-1.65). Moreover, those neonates who were born to mothers with HPV co-infections had a significantly higher risk of ICU admission (OR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.01-2.49). This study revealed the significant association between specific HPV infections during pregnancy and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of monitoring HPV infections during pregnancy and suggest that an enhanced rate of the nine-valent HPV vaccine and strengthen the development and application of the non-nine-valent HPV vaccine could improve maternal-fetal health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.