Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128345›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Ash dieback and hydrology affect tree growth patterns under climate change in European floodplain forests.

Stefanie Henkel, Ronny Richter, Karl Andraczek, Roger Mundry, Madeleine Dontschev, Rolf A Engelmann, Timo Hartmann, Christian Hecht, Hans Dieter Kasperidus, Georg Rieland and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Stefanie HenkelSystematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Institute for Biology, Leipzig University, Johannisallee 21, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. shenkel@uni-leipzig.de.
Ronny RichterSystematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Institute for Biology, Leipzig University, Johannisallee 21, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Karl AndraczekSystematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Institute for Biology, Leipzig University, Johannisallee 21, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Roger MundryCognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Kellnerweg 4, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Madeleine DontschevDepartment of Plant Ecology, Institute for Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
Rolf A EngelmannSystematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Institute for Biology, Leipzig University, Johannisallee 21, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Timo HartmannDepartment of Conservation Biology and Social-Ecological Systems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian HechtDepartment of Conservation Biology and Social-Ecological Systems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Hans Dieter KasperidusDepartment of Conservation Biology and Social-Ecological Systems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Georg RielandDepartment of Conservation Biology and Social-Ecological Systems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Mathias ScholzDepartment of Conservation Biology and Social-Ecological Systems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Carolin Seele-DilbatDepartment of Conservation Biology and Social-Ecological Systems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael ViewegDepartment of Conservation Biology and Social-Ecological Systems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian WirthSystematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Institute for Biology, Leipzig University, Johannisallee 21, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Floodplain forests are currently undergoing substantial reorganization processes due to the combined effects of management-induced altered hydrological conditions, climate change and novel invasive pathogens. Nowadays, the ash dieback is one of the most concerning diseases affecting European floodplain forests, causing substantial tree mortality and threatening the loss of the dominant key tree species of the hardwood floodplain forest, Fraxinus excelsior. Understanding how the increased light availability caused by pathogen-driven mortality in combination with altered hydrological conditions and climate change affects growth responses in a diverse forest community is of crucial importance for conservation efforts. Thus, we examined growth of the main tree species in response to ash dieback and how it depended on altered hydrological conditions under novel climatic conditions for the lower and upper canopy in the floodplain forest of Leipzig, Germany. Our study period encompassed the consecutive drought years from 2018 to 2020. We found that tree growth responded mostly positively to increased light availability, but only on moist sites, while tree growth largely declined on dry sites, suggesting that water availability is a critical factor for tree species to be able to benefit from increased light availability due to canopy disturbances caused by ash dieback. This hydrological effect was species-specific in the lower canopy but not in the upper canopy. While, in the lower canopy, some species such as the competitive shade-tolerant but flood-intolerant Acer pseudoplatanus and Acer platanoides benefited from ash dieback on moist sites, others were less affected or suffered disproportionally, indicating that floodplain forests might turn into a novel ecosystem dominated by competitive Acer species, which may have detrimental effects on ecosystem functioning. Our results give hints on floodplain forests of the future and have important implications for conservation measures, suggesting that a substantial revitalization of natural hydrological dynamics is important to maintain a tree composition that resembles the existing one and thus sustain their conservation status.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeForestsFraxinusPlant DiseasesTreesEuropeFloodsGermanyHydrologyAsh diebackClimate changeFloodplain forestForest reorganizationHydrologyTree growth

Identifiers

PMID40128345
PMCPMC11933702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.