ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2025
The current state of forensic imaging - recommended radiological tools and international guidelines.
Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Micro-computed tomography for gunshot residue detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of distance-dependent deposition patterns.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Deep learning-based sex estimation from multi-planar cranial CT images in a Thai population.Anatomical science international · 2026Article
- Computed tomography as a tool in the analysis of dentomaxillofacial characteristics for human identification: A bibliometric analysis of the most cited publications.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Broncholithiasis mimicking metallic projectiles at autopsy: a forensic diagnostic pitfall in putrefied bodies.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Histological artifacts induced by the contrast agent in Multi-Phase Post-Mortem CT Angiography (MPMCTA): Part I - Normal Tissues.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- From promising postmortem photon-counting CT image quality to court-defensible utility: a standards-first pathway.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The last few decades have seen the emergence of forensic imaging, both clinical and post-mortem. Year after year, the scientific community has refined the radiological tools that can be used for post-mortem and clinical forensic purposes. As a result, scientific societies have published recommendations that are essential for the daily work of forensic imaging. This third part of the review of the current state of forensic imaging describes these recommended radiological tools and also presents an overview of the various international guidelines dealing with post mortem imaging that can be found in the literature or that have been written by scientific societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.