ArticleScientific reports2025
Data harmonization for the analysis of personalized treatment of psychosis with metacognitive training.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining sex as a potential moderator of metacognitive training for psychosis efficacy on cognitive insight and jumping to conclusions bias: Evidence from a large-scale harmonized database.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2026Article
- Bidirectional data harmonization across the multiple chronic disease disparities research consortium: A pipeline description of opportunities and challenges.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026Article
- Article
- PERMEPSY: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind proof-of-concept trial of personalized metacognitive training for adults with psychosis - a study protocol.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- An artificial intelligence-based platform for personalized predictions of Metacognitive Training effectiveness.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Personalized medicine is a data-driven approach that aims to adapt patients' diagnostics and therapies to their characteristics and needs. The availability of patients' data is therefore paramount for the personalization of treatments on the basis of predictive models, and even more so in machine learning-based analyses. Data harmonization is an essential part of the process of data curation. This study presents research on data harmonization for the development of a harmonized retrospective database of patients in Metacognitive Training (MCT) treatment for psychotic disorders. This work is part of the European ERAPERMED 2022-292 research project entitled 'Towards a Personalized Medicine Approach to Psychological Treatment of Psychosis' (PERMEPSY), which focuses on the development of a personalized medicine platform for the treatment of psychosis. The study integrates information from 22 studies into a common format to enable a data analytical approach for personalized treatment. The harmonized database comprises information about 698 patients who underwent MCT and includes a wide range of sociodemographic variables and psychological indicators used to assess a patient's mental health state. The characteristics of patients participating in the study are analyzed using descriptive statistics and exploratory data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.