ArticleScientific reports2025
Employing artificial bee and ant colony optimization in machine learning techniques as a cognitive neuroscience tool.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A fast retrieval method for multilevel redundant data in grid resource business middle office based on improved decision tree algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Powered Smart Healthcare Systems in the Era of Big Data: Applications, Diagnostic Insights, Challenges, and Ethical Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Higher education is essential because it exposes students to a variety of areas. The academic performance of IT students is crucial and might fail if it isn't documented to identify the features influencing them, as well as their strengths and shortcomings. The student academic prediction system needs to be enhanced so that teachers can forecast their students' performance. Numerous studies have been conducted to increase the prediction accuracy of IT students, but they encountered difficulties with unbalanced data and algorithm tuning. To address these issues, the study proposed different machine learning (ML) algorithms that handled imbalanced data by applying the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) and employing hyperparameter tuning algorithms to enhance prediction during the training process. The ML models we used were decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbor, and XGBoost. The models were fine-tuned by applying Ant colony optimization (ACO) and artificial bee colony optimization techniques. Subsequently, these optimization techniques further enhanced the performance of the models. After comparing them, the results showed that SMOTE and ACO combined with the DT model outperformed other models for academic prediction. Additionally, the study utilized the Kendall Tau correlation coefficient technique to analyze the correlation between features and identify factors that positively or negatively impact student success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.