Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128279›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Employing artificial bee and ant colony optimization in machine learning techniques as a cognitive neuroscience tool.

Kajal Mahawar, Punam Rattan, Ammar Jalamneh, Mohd Shukri Ab Yajid, Omar Abdeljaber, Raman Kumar, Ayodele Lasisi, Muhammad Imam Ammarullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kajal MahawarLovely Professional University, Phagwara, 144411, Punjab, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5423-8159
Punam RattanLovely Professional University, Phagwara, 144411, Punjab, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1965-0703
Ammar JalamnehCollege of Arts and Science, Applied Science University, Al Ekir, 3201, Kingdom of Bahrain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3742-7492
Mohd Shukri Ab YajidManagement and Science University, Shah Alam, 40100, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5688-4392
Omar AbdeljaberHourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, 19328, Jordan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0202-8088
Raman KumarDepartment of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana, 141006, Punjab, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2934-7609
Ayodele LasisiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha, 61421, Asir, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-9785
Muhammad Imam AmmarullahDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 50275, Central Java, Indonesia. imamammarullah@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8845-7202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Higher education is essential because it exposes students to a variety of areas. The academic performance of IT students is crucial and might fail if it isn't documented to identify the features influencing them, as well as their strengths and shortcomings. The student academic prediction system needs to be enhanced so that teachers can forecast their students' performance. Numerous studies have been conducted to increase the prediction accuracy of IT students, but they encountered difficulties with unbalanced data and algorithm tuning. To address these issues, the study proposed different machine learning (ML) algorithms that handled imbalanced data by applying the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) and employing hyperparameter tuning algorithms to enhance prediction during the training process. The ML models we used were decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbor, and XGBoost. The models were fine-tuned by applying Ant colony optimization (ACO) and artificial bee colony optimization techniques. Subsequently, these optimization techniques further enhanced the performance of the models. After comparing them, the results showed that SMOTE and ACO combined with the DT model outperformed other models for academic prediction. Additionally, the study utilized the Kendall Tau correlation coefficient technique to analyze the correlation between features and identify factors that positively or negatively impact student success.

Indexed as

AntsCognitionMachine LearningNeurosciencesAlgorithmsAnimalsBeesDecision TreesHumansStudentsAnt colony optimizationArtificial bee colonyDecision treeHyperparameter tuningKendall TauMachine learningStudent learning outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40128279
PMCPMC11933464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.