ArticleScientific reports2025
Detection of cyber attacks in electric vehicle charging systems using a remaining useful life generative adversarial network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- STAG-GuardNet: UAV-Assisted Spatio-Temporal Attack Graph Learning for Secure IoT Communication in Smart EV Charging Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Federated Anomaly Detection for IoT-Enabled EV Charging Cybersecurity Under Aggressive and Stealth Cyberattacks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Blockchain and bio-inspired deep learning for energy-efficient EV-to-grid optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A scalable cloud-integrated AI platform for real-time optimization of EV charging and resilient microgrid energy management.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lithium-ion battery RUL prediction based on optimized VMD-SSA-PatchTST algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anomaly detection with grid sentinel framework for electric vehicle charging stations in a smart grid environment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cybersecurity attacks targeting electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) and the broader electric vehicle (EV) ecosystem have become an escalating concern with the increasing adoption of EVs and the growing connectivity of the infrastructure supporting them. The present research aims to contribute to continuing cybersecurity studies on electric vehicle charging stations. In line with this objective, this study proposes the remaining useful life (RUL) approach to demonstrate the potential impact of estimating the remaining time of a cyber attack on EVSE and what revolutionary changes it can bring to cyber security strategies using a generative adversarial network (GAN). By taking a proactive stance, the manuscript will increase security and reduce the economic and reputational losses associated with cyber incidents. Accurate RUL estimates present valuable information about the status of the EVSE infrastructure. Thus, informed decisions on maintenance and crew scheduling are taken. To test the technique's effectiveness, we assess this approach on attack scenarios, including network and host attacks on the EV charger (Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment-EVSE) in idle and charging states. Furthermore, we assess the prediction results of different deep learning models, such as gated recurrent units (GRUs), long short-term memory (LSTM), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), convolution neural networks (CNNs), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), and dense layer integrated with generative adversarial networks (GANs), using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean squared error (MSE), and R-squared (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.