Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128250›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Efficient photovoltaics integrated with innovative Li-ion batteries for extreme (+ 80

Ethan Adams, Alexander Camacho, Evan Mammana, Soohwan Kim, Thomas E Adams, Vilas G Pol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ethan AdamsDavidson School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Alexander CamachoDavidson School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Evan MammanaDavidson School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Soohwan KimDavidson School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Thomas E AdamsCrane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN, 47522, USA.
Vilas G PolDavidson School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. vpol@purdue.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current pursuits for further exploration into extreme environments like aerospace, outer space, and Arctic conditions require matching energy harvesting and storage technologies that can efficiently operate in extreme conditions. While current systems utilize a variety of different battery chemistries, photovoltaics, and radioisotope power systems to power and store the required energy, at ultra-low temperatures (<-60 °C), current batteries have extremely low-capacity retention (< 20 %) and require extensive heating coils and thermal shielding to work when paired with photovoltaics. To simultaneously test both current and new types of whole photovoltaics (PV) and innovative Li-ion batteries (LIBs) at extreme temperatures (180 °C to -185 °C) in the research laboratory, an Integrated Photovoltaic and Battery (IntPB) system has been developed at Purdue University. The first IntPB allows for testing a variety of energy storage devices (Li-ion, Na-ion, K-ion batteries) and harvesting technologies (PV, radioisotope, thermoelectric), verifying their suitability when paired at a wide range of temperatures and charging protocols. A specially designed IntPB system allowed for testing either small-scale coin cells (10 mAh) or larger pouch cells (1 Ah) with polycrystalline silicon PV between 80 °C to -120 °C. It effectively charged the lithium metal battery using a niobium tungsten oxide cathode and 1 M LiFSI in cyclopentyl methyl ether electrolyte to comparable capacities. When discharged with the battery cycler, the battery provided similar capacities at a constant current discharge, thus ensuring that the system was able to charge/discharge equivalent amounts of energy. At 80 °C, -105 °C, and - 120 °C, the IntPB was able to charge/discharge 150 mAh g⁻¹, 30 mAh g⁻¹, and 6 mAh g⁻¹ capacity, respectively. This indicated that the pairing of the PV and battery was able to charge/discharge the battery at a wide range of temperatures that the system would be expected to experience in places such as the desert, Arctic, or outer space. Contrasting temperature effects in integrated PV-battery systems pose a significant challenge: PV efficiency improves at low temperatures due to increased semiconductor band gap, while LIB performance deteriorates due to sluggish Li-ion movement within the electrolyte and across interfaces, necessitating careful system optimization to balance enhanced PV output with limited battery storage capacity.

Identifiers

PMID40128250
PMCPMC11933699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.