ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficient self-attention with smart pruning for sustainable large language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Rise of Small Language Models in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Survey.Computer science review · 2026Article
- Steering open-source AI to accelerate the sustainable development goals.Nature communications · 2026Article
- LLM-enabled adaptive scheduling in IoT sensing for optimized network performance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- When collaboration fails: persuasion driven adversarial influence in multi agent large language model debate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cognitive difference text classification in online knowledge collaboration based on SA-BiLSTM hybrid model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- GTAT-GRN: a graph topology-aware attention method with multi-source feature fusion for gene regulatory network inference.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized artificial intelligence by enabling multitasking across diverse fields. However, their high computational demands result in significant environmental impacts, particularly in terms of energy and water consumption. This paper addresses these issues by proposing an innovative compression approach to reducing LLM sizes. We focus on compressing the internal transformer layers, which are critical contributors to LLMs' computational complexity. Our approach combines new mathematical and structural key methods for model compression. We begin by applying Forward Propagation Pruning (FPP) to compress the embedding and feed-forward layers, utilizing a weight freezing and zeroing technique for suspected unused parameters. This reduces the number of trainable parameters, accelerating the overall training process and enabling faster convergence. Second, the Weight Matrix Folding method is introduced to efficiently prune the self-attention layer matrices in a simple and efficient mathematical model. This method integrates Identical Row Compression (IRC) to optimize the compression of the Query and Key matrices, alongside Diagonal Weight Compression (DWC), which reformulates the Value matrix into a diagonal structure. Consequently, this technique significantly diminishes parameter variability across the three metrics, enhancing consistency and performance while simplifying complexity. The compression approach is evaluated on three language modeling datasets and eight widely used classification datasets, comparing it to various pruning methods. Our method successfully compresses transformer layers by 99% and linear layers by 70%, resulting in an overall model compression of around 70%, while maintaining nearly the same accuracy. Notably, with moderate compression rates of 20% to 40%, model performance not only remained stable but even improved. This leads to substantial reductions in memory usage and computational demands, making LLMs more resource-efficient and highlighting the potential to optimize them for a more sustainable AI future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.