Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128247›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Efficient self-attention with smart pruning for sustainable large language models.

Samir Brahim Belhaouari, Insaf Kraidia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samir Brahim BelhaouariDivision of Information and Computing Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Ar-Rayyan, Qatar. sbelhaouari@hbku.edu.qa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-0490
Insaf KraidiaFaculty of Information Technology, Department of Networks and Cybersecurity, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan. i.kraidia@ammanu.edu.jo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5538-9883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized artificial intelligence by enabling multitasking across diverse fields. However, their high computational demands result in significant environmental impacts, particularly in terms of energy and water consumption. This paper addresses these issues by proposing an innovative compression approach to reducing LLM sizes. We focus on compressing the internal transformer layers, which are critical contributors to LLMs' computational complexity. Our approach combines new mathematical and structural key methods for model compression. We begin by applying Forward Propagation Pruning (FPP) to compress the embedding and feed-forward layers, utilizing a weight freezing and zeroing technique for suspected unused parameters. This reduces the number of trainable parameters, accelerating the overall training process and enabling faster convergence. Second, the Weight Matrix Folding method is introduced to efficiently prune the self-attention layer matrices in a simple and efficient mathematical model. This method integrates Identical Row Compression (IRC) to optimize the compression of the Query and Key matrices, alongside Diagonal Weight Compression (DWC), which reformulates the Value matrix into a diagonal structure. Consequently, this technique significantly diminishes parameter variability across the three metrics, enhancing consistency and performance while simplifying complexity. The compression approach is evaluated on three language modeling datasets and eight widely used classification datasets, comparing it to various pruning methods. Our method successfully compresses transformer layers by 99% and linear layers by 70%, resulting in an overall model compression of around 70%, while maintaining nearly the same accuracy. Notably, with moderate compression rates of 20% to 40%, model performance not only remained stable but even improved. This leads to substantial reductions in memory usage and computational demands, making LLMs more resource-efficient and highlighting the potential to optimize them for a more sustainable AI future.

Indexed as

CompressionComputational DemandsConsumptionLarge Language Models (LLMs)PruningSelf-attention

Identifiers

PMID40128247
PMCPMC11933332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.