Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128238›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Using machine learning to simultaneously quantify multiple cognitive components of episodic memory.

Soroush Mirjalili, Audrey Duarte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Soroush MirjaliliDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. soroushmirjalili@utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0572-8661
Audrey DuarteDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN COGNITIVE AGINGT32AG000175 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DUARTE, AUDREY · 1988 to 2020
$5.6M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000175Sigma Xi (Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society) G20221001-4163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why do we remember some events but forget others? Previous studies attempting to decode successful vs. unsuccessful brain states to investigate this question have met with limited success, potentially due, in part, to assessing episodic memory as a unidimensional process, despite evidence that multiple domains contribute to episodic encoding. Using a machine learning algorithm known as "transfer learning", we leveraged visual perception, sustained attention, and selective attention brain states to better predict episodic memory performance from trial-to-trial encoding electroencephalography (EEG) activity. We found that this multidimensional treatment of memory decoding improved prediction performance compared to traditional, unidimensional, methods, with each cognitive domain explaining unique variance in decoding of successful encoding-related neural activity. Importantly, this approach could be applied to cognitive domains outside of memory. Overall, this study provides critical insight into the underlying reasons why some events are remembered while others are not.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionMachine LearningMemory, EpisodicAdultAlgorithmsAttentionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40128238
PMCPMC11933255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.