ArticleScientific reports2025
The effect of storing fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle in glycerinated solution on their passive elastic modulus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated Opto-Biomechatronics For Single Muscle Fibre Structure-Function Assessment: The MyoRobot 3.0.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Storing skeletal muscle specimens in glycerinated solution is a common preservation method before biomechanical testing. This study examined the impact of glycerinated solution on passive elastic modulus in muscle tissues at three scales: fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle. Tensile testing was conducted on Tibialis Anterior muscle specimens obtained from nine male Sprague-Dawley rats. In total, 36 fibers, 48 fiber bundles, and 12 whole muscles were tested. Half of the specimens were tested immediately, while the other half were stored in glycerinated solution at -20 °C for 2 weeks prior to testing. The elastic moduli of all specimens were determined from stress-strain curves at 10%, 20%, and 30% strains. The results showed glycerinated solution led to about 50% decrease in elastic modulus for fibers and bundles (p < 0.001) compared to fresh muscle, while whole muscle storage caused fiber damage in the tissue center. Furthermore, the slack sarcomere length of the stored fibers and fiber bundles decreased while their cross-sectional area increased (p < 0.041). For the whole muscles, storing reduced both mass and physiological cross-sectional area of the samples (p < 0.002). These findings highlight the effect of glycerinated storage solution on muscle specimens of different sizes; and indicate that tensile testing of stored fibers and fiber bundles primarily evaluates their passive properties, while testing fresh fibers and fiber bundles assesses both passive and some active mechanical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.