ArticleScientific reports2025
Study on combustion reaction products and free radicals of aliphatic hydrocarbon functional groups in coal based on ML potential MD.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-Performance NHNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Gas-phase products generated by aliphatic hydrocarbon functional groups during the spontaneous combustion of coal represent a significant source of environmental pollution. A primary focus of contemporary research is the investigation of their microscopic reaction pathways and the dynamics of free radical transformations. This study examines the combustion and pyrolysis reaction mechanisms of three distinct aliphatic hydrocarbon functional groups utilising the Machine Learning Potential Molecular Dynamics (ML potential MD) method, with validation conducted through thermogravimetric-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (TG-FTIR) and in-situ FTIR experiments. The findings suggest that the reactivity of the ‒CH group is the highest, followed by ‒CH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.