Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40128157›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2025

Optimized outcome of the Ross procedure in children: single-centre experience†.

Peter Murin, Julia Gaal, Robin Stenzel, Viktoria Weixler, Olga Romanchenko, Raphael Seiler, Stanislav Ovroutski, Felix Berger, Mi-Young Cho, Joachim Photiadis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Ross Operation in Children-What Is the Long-Term Fate of the Autograft?Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peter MurinDepartment of Congenital Heart Surgery-Pediatric Heart Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Julia GaalDepartment of Congenital Heart Surgery-Pediatric Heart Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Robin StenzelDepartment of Congenital Heart Surgery-Pediatric Heart Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Viktoria WeixlerDepartment of Congenital Heart Surgery-Pediatric Heart Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Olga RomanchenkoDepartment of Congenital Heart Surgery-Pediatric Heart Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Raphael SeilerDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease-Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Stanislav OvroutskiDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease-Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Felix BergerDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease-Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Mi-Young ChoDepartment of Congenital Heart Surgery-Pediatric Heart Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Joachim PhotiadisDepartment of Congenital Heart Surgery-Pediatric Heart Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Marcus KelmDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease-Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Ross procedure with autograft reinforcement has been proposed as a strategy to prevent autograft failure in adults, but outcome data in children during somatic growth remain limited. We investigated long-term outcomes following an individualized autograft reinforcement protocol to evaluate survival and reintervention rates.

methodsBetween January 1995 and December 2022, 233 patients <18 years [median age: 7 (1-13) years] underwent the Ross procedure, including 60 infants (26%). Most frequently free-root autograft implantation without reinforcement was performed (n = 156, 67%). Autograft reinforcement was applied in 77 patients (33%) using either subcoronary implantation (n = 65, 28%) or external prosthetic support (n = 12, 5%). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used for survival and reintervention analyses. Risk factors for reintervention were identified by Cox proportional hazards regression.

resultsReinforcement was associated with improved survival (5-year survival rates of 97.1% vs 87.0%, 10-year survival rates of 97.1% versus 86.99%, P = 0.017). No differences in autograft reintervention between the groups were found (1-year rates of 100% vs 99.4%, 5-year rates of 100%, P = 0.4852). Right ventricle-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) reintervention-free survival at 5 years was higher for homografts compared to xenografts (96.9% vs 79.4%, P < 0.001).

conclusionsThe Ross procedure in children demonstrated excellent long-term outcomes with low autograft reintervention rates in both groups. Reinforcement was associated with improved long-term survival while autograft-related reinterventions did not differ significantly between groups. Older age at Ross and homograft use correlated with lower RV-PA reintervention risk. Multicentre evaluation of reinforcement techniques is required to assess the outcome differences observed in this single-centre experience.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationPulmonary ValveAdolescentAutograftsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleReoperationRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeAutograft failureAutograft reinforcementRoss procedureSubcoronary implantation

Identifiers

PMID40128157
PMCPMC11992329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.