ReviewBMJ global health2025
Financing the introduction of new vaccines to the national immunisation programme in China: challenges and options for action.
Review in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Local Pilots to National Implementation: A Journey Towards Free HPV Vaccination in China.Vaccines · 2026Review
- From local pilots to national policy: key issues and challenges in implementing nationwide HPV vaccination in China.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
- Article
- Evaluation of TST/C-TST combination for latent tuberculosis infection screening: diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness compared to TST/IGRAs.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Availability of Hib, Pneumococcal, Rotavirus, and HPV vaccines in China: Implication for equity in access to immunization services.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Health economics and vaccine financing in the eastern Mediterranean region: A needs assessment.Vaccine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensuring adequate and sustainable financing of national immunisation programmes (NIPs) is one of the important elements to achieve the Immunisation Agenda 2030. Many middle-income countries ineligible for support from the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation have relatively slow progress in introducing new critical vaccines, due largely to financial constraints. China has not introduced any vaccines into the NIP since 2008. Its funding for the NIP, relying solely on the government budget, has been decreasing as the number of targeted children has declined. This paper presents the current situation of NIP and identifies main challenges in vaccine introduction in China: fluctuating and insufficient financing, restrictions on using health insurance funds for immunisation, high prices for non-NIP vaccines and the complicated and non-transparent decision-making mechanism to adjust NIP. There are also opportunities for introducing vaccines, such as local pilots to provide free or subsidised new vaccines and reducing domestic vaccine prices. Feasible options to optimise NIP financing in China include increasing government funding, diversifying financing channels such as using health insurance funds, improving the vaccine procurement mechanism and optimising the new vaccine introduction decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.