Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40127932›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2025

The Effect of Speech Masking on the Human Subcortical Response to Continuous Speech.

Melissa J Polonenko, Ross K Maddox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melissa J PolonenkoDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455 mpolonen@umn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1914-6117
Ross K MaddoxDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 14627.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2668-0238

Funding

Rapid Acquisition of the Frequency-Specific Auditory Brainstem Response Through Parallel Stimulus PresentationR01DC017962 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Ross K Maddox · 2019 to 2026
$3.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory masking-the interference of the encoding and processing of an acoustic stimulus imposed by one or more competing stimuli-is nearly omnipresent in daily life and presents a critical barrier to many listeners, including people with hearing loss, users of hearing aids and cochlear implants, and people with auditory processing disorders. The perceptual aspects of masking have been actively studied for several decades, and particular emphasis has been placed on masking of speech by other speech sounds. The neural effects of such masking, especially at the subcortical level, have been much less studied, in large part due to the technical limitations of making such measurements. Recent work has allowed estimation of the auditory brainstem response (ABR), whose characteristic waves are linked to specific subcortical areas, to naturalistic speech. In this study, we used those techniques to measure the encoding of speech stimuli that were masked by one or more simultaneous other speech stimuli. We presented listeners with simultaneous speech from one, two, three, or five simultaneous talkers, corresponding to a range of signal-to-noise ratios (clean, 0, -3, and -6 dB), and derived the ABR to each talker in the mixture. Each talker in a mixture was treated in turn as a target sound masked by other talkers, making the response quicker to acquire. We found consistently across listeners that ABR Wave V amplitudes decreased and latencies increased as the number of competing talkers increased.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemPerceptual MaskingSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultauditory brainstem responseEEGmaskingspeechtemporal response function

Identifiers

PMID40127932
PMCPMC11974362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.