ReviewExperimental eye research2025
Assessing structure - Function relationships in non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Review in Experimental eye research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a neurodegenerative disease, is the leading cause of visual impairment in industrialized countries. Challenges in defining structural/functional relationships at various stages of disease especially with non-neovascular AMD, have slowed therapeutic development. Development of such sensitive and specific markers associated with AMD progression could provide the basis necessary for future regulatory outcome variables that will be useful in assessing new, innovative AMD therapies. Advanced imaging technologies such as high-resolution optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence and near infrared imaging; and functional tests including rod-mediated dark adaptation, microperimetry, fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy and others will be important in the evaluation of these structure/function correlations. Development of more advanced methods to study structure such as high-resolution OCT and en face OCT offer further opportunities to better correlate structure and function in clinical trials, and to better define useful biomarkers of visual outcome endpoints. Dark adaptation, although correlated with AMD stage, is difficult to incorporate as endpoint in clinical trials because dark adaptation changes slowly and the technique is time consuming. Microperimetry has become a useful outcome variable in many clinical trials and new methodology may improve its utility in structure-function correlation. These and other newer techniques will require further prospective studies to determine their clinical utility in early AMD detection, prediction of disease progression from intermediate to late stages, and the ability to monitor the advancement of non-neovascular AMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.