ArticleEndocrine connections2025
German DVO risk score identified more patients requiring treatment compared to FRAX.
Article in Endocrine connections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low alkaline phosphatase in adults: implications for the diagnosis of hypophosphatasia during evaluation for osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Calcium isotope ratio (δOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Low Bone Density and Fracture Risk Assessed with the FRAX Tool in German Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Fracture risk determination is essential when recommending treatment in osteoporosis management. We calculated the risk probabilities of major osteoporotic and hip fractures using the DVO score established in German-speaking countries and the FRAX tool. Methods: We retrospectively analysed data from 555 female patients (mean age 64.2 ± 10.3 years) evaluated for osteoporosis. As suggested by DVO guidelines before 2023, we set the therapy threshold of >30% for vertebral and hip fractures. Major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture risk (HF) were calculated based on corresponding FRAX scores. We applied the internationally most common therapy threshold of ≥20% for MOF and ≥3% for HF and determined the 'DVO-equivalent risk levels' for FRAX-based assessment. Results: The DVO score identified 52.8% of women as having a 10-year risk of hip and vertebral fractures >30%. FRAX score for HF ≥ 3% without bone mineral density (BMD) identified the highest number of patients (56%). The proportion of female patients identified for treatment only by DVO score (14.6%) were more likely to present spinal fractures (38.3 vs 18.6%), whereas the 10.6% of patients only identified by FRAX including BMD presented more peripheral fractures (40.7 vs 29.6%). The thresholds for this 'DVO-equivalent risk level' for 'FRAX with BMD' would be ≥10% for MOF and ≥2.6% for HF. Conclusion: Given the differences in the DVO and FRAX scores, we highly recommend considering both scores when assessing individual women for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.