ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Explainable AI for Intraoperative Motor-Evoked Potential Muscle Classification in Neurosurgery: Bicentric Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Corticobulbar Motor Evoked Potentials: A Systematic Review of Technical Variations.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Review
- Neurosurgical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- [D-wave-guided navigation in spinal cord surgery: From monitoring to decision-making].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Review
- From algorithms to clinical execution: A cross-validated knowledge atlas of AI-enabled precision care (2015-2025).Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) guides the surgeon in ensuring motor pathway integrity during high-risk neurosurgical and orthopedic procedures. Although motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are valuable for predicting motor outcomes, the key features of predictive signals are not well understood, and standardized warning criteria are lacking. Developing a muscle identification prediction model could increase patient safety while allowing the exploration of relevant features for the task.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to expand the development of machine learning (ML) methods for muscle classification and evaluate them in a bicentric setup. Further, we aim to identify key features of MEP signals that contribute to accurate muscle classification using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques.
methodsThis study used ML and deep learning models, specifically random forest (RF) classifiers and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to classify MEP signals from routine supratentorial neurosurgical procedures from two medical centers according to muscle identity of four muscles (extensor digitorum, abductor pollicis brevis, tibialis anterior, and abductor hallucis). The algorithms were trained and validated on a total of 36,992 MEPs from 151 surgeries in one center, and they were tested on 24,298 MEPs from 58 surgeries from the other center. Depending on the algorithm, time-series, feature-engineered, and time-frequency representations of the MEP data were used. XAI techniques, specifically Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values and gradient class activation maps (Grad-CAM), were implemented to identify important signal features.
resultsHigh classification accuracy was achieved with the RF classifier, reaching 87.9% accuracy on the validation set and 80% accuracy on the test set. The 1D- and 2D-CNNs demonstrated comparably strong performance. Our XAI findings indicate that frequency components and peak latencies are crucial for accurate MEP classification, providing insights that could inform intraoperative warning criteria.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the effectiveness of ML techniques and the importance of XAI in enhancing trust in and reliability of artificial intelligence-driven IONM applications. Further, it may help to identify new intrinsic features of MEP signals so far overlooked in conventional warning criteria. By reducing the risk of muscle mislabeling and by providing the basis for possible new warning criteria, this study may help to increase patient safety during surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.