ArticleBlood advances2025
Real-world outcomes for young adult patients receiving CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute leukemia, version 2.0.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Guideline
- Trial
- Advances in targeted and cellular therapies for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: immunotherapeutic strategies and challenges.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Differential cytokine architecture in patients treated with CART19 versus CART22.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of CAR T cell therapy in children and young adults with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- CD19/CD22 bivalent CAR T cells in children, adolescents and young adults with B-ALL: final phase 1 trial results.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Challenges and advances in CAR-T cell therapy for B-ALL.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Article
- [How I manage relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with CD19 CAR- T cells throughout whole-process management].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Article
- Maintenance after CAR T? Are we there yet? Reducing the risk of relapse after loss of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell persistence in ALL.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Article
- Precision immunotherapy with CAR-T cells in pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: advances and unanswered challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Impact of inotuzumab ozogamicin as bridging therapy and tumor burden in CAR-T therapy for B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
46 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractTisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) are approved CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T) products for young adults (YA) with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A distinct analysis of YAs receiving commercial CD19 CAR T has not been reported. Using retrospective data from the Pediatric Real-World CAR T Consortium and the Real-World Outcomes of CAR T in Adult ALL collaboration, we describe the efficacy and safety of tisa-cel and brexu-cel in 70 YAs (18-26 years; tisa-cel, n = 50; brexu-cel, n = 20). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were observed more frequently for brexu-cel vs tisa-cel (CRS, 85% vs 56%; ICANS, 40% vs 18%). Complete response rates were similar between products at 80% for brexu-cel and 88% for tisa-cel. Relapse-free survival (RFS) at 12 months was 46% for brexu-cel and 36% for tisa-cel. Durability of remission over 12 months was 61% for brexu-cel vs 41% for tisa-cel; 12-month overall survival (OS) for brexu-cel was 84% vs 68% for tisa-cel. In multivariate analysis, low disease burden was associated with improved OS, whereas inotuzumab before CAR T was associated with inferior outcomes. This study demonstrates comparable real-world efficacy among YAs receiving CD19 CAR T irrespective of CAR T construct; however, rates of toxicity seem higher with brexu-cel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.