Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40127270›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

A national megastudy shows that email nudges to elementary school teachers boost student math achievement, particularly when personalized.

Angela L Duckworth, Ahra Ko, Katherine L Milkman, Joseph S Kay, Eugen Dimant, Dena M Gromet, Aden Halpern, Youngwoo Jung, Madeline K Paxson, Ramon A Silvera Zumaran and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Payment integrity in government programs: Takeaways from incorporating the behavioral sciences in US federal evaluations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Angela L DuckworthDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-2644-3729
Ahra KoBehavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School and the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-7295-1097
Katherine L MilkmanDepartment of Operations, Information and Decisions, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-9706-4830
Joseph S KayBehavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School and the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-1436-1304
Eugen DimantCenter for Social Norms and Behavioral Dynamics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-5228-6966
Dena M GrometBehavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School and the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0001-9153-7193
Aden HalpernBehavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School and the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Youngwoo JungBehavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School and the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0009-0002-9621-6676
Madeline K PaxsonBehavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School and the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Ramon A Silvera ZumaranBehavior Change for Good Initiative, The Wharton School and the School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Ron BermanDepartment of Marketing, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-8594-3627
Ilana BrodyAnderson School of Management, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0003-4093-8426
Colin F CamererDivision of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Elizabeth A CanningDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.ORCID 0000-0002-6864-2224
Hengchen DaiAnderson School of Management, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0001-7640-6558
Marcos GalloDivision of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.ORCID 0000-0002-8227-2661
Hal E HershfieldAnderson School of Management, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0002-1507-7022
Matthew D HilcheyBehavioural Economics in Action at Rotman, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5R 0A3.
Ariel KalilHarris School of Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON 60637.ORCID 0000-0002-7506-5023
Kathryn M KroeperDepartment of Psychology, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT 06825.ORCID 0000-0003-2701-5053
Amy LyonSchool of Business and Social Sciences, Colby-Sawyer College, New London, NH 03257.ORCID 0009-0002-8326-2366
Benjamin S ManningSloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0009-0000-9977-2390
Nina MazarDepartment of Marketing, Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.ORCID 0000-0001-8248-654X
Michelle MicheliniHarris School of Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON 60637.ORCID 0009-0000-4628-879X
Susan E MayerHarris School of Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON 60637.
Mary C MurphyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.ORCID 0000-0001-6511-498X
Philip OreopoulosDepartment of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G7.
Sharon E ParkerConsultant, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
Renante RondinaBehavioural Economics in Action at Rotman, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5R 0A3.
Dilip SomanBehavioural Economics in Action at Rotman, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5R 0A3.ORCID 0000-0001-5998-4153
Christophe Van den BulteDepartment of Marketing, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0001-9708-1596

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the alarming recent decline in US math achievement, we conducted a national megastudy in which 140,461 elementary school teachers who collectively taught 2,992,027 students were randomly assigned to receive a variety of behaviorally informed email nudges aimed at improving students' progress in math. Specifically, we partnered with the nonprofit educational platform Zearn Math to compare the impact of 15 different interventions with a reminder-only megastudy control condition. All 16 conditions entailed weekly emails delivered to teachers over 4-wk in the fall of 2021. The best-performing intervention, which encouraged teachers to log into Zearn Math for an updated report on how their students were doing that week, produced a 5.06% increase in students' math progress (3.30% after accounting for the winner's curse). In exploratory analyses, teachers who received any behaviorally informed email nudge (vs. a reminder-only megastudy control) saw their students' math progress boosted by an average of 1.89% during the 4-wk intervention period; emails referencing personalized data (i.e., classroom-specific statistics) outperformed emails that did not by 2.26%. While small in size, these intervention effects were consistent across school socioeconomic status and school type (public, private, etc.) and, further, persisted in the 8-wk post-intervention period. Collectively, these findings underscore both how difficult it is to change behavior and the need for large-scale, rigorous, empirical research of the sort undertaken in this megastudy.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessElectronic MailMathematicsSchool TeachersStudentsChildFemaleHumansMaleSchoolsfield experimentmath achievementmegastudynudging

Identifiers

PMID40127270
PMCPMC12002261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.