ReviewBiochemistry2025
Targeting Polymeric Nanoparticles to Specific Cell Populations in the Liver.
Review in Biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of clinically relevant iron oxide nanoparticles on macrophage polarization, tumor growth and tumor microenvironment modulation.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026Article
- Peptide-Functionalized Liposomal Nanocarriers for Targeted Therapy of Liver Fibrosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Design, Mechanisms, and Clinical Prospects.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Review
- Nanomedicine for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Disease Heterogeneity to Precision Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Emerging Approaches for the Treatment of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: The Application of Nanomedicines.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle-based systems for liver therapy: Overcoming fibrosis and enhancing drug efficacy.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoparticles (NPs) are beneficial for delivery of drugs in a variety of settings, serving to protect their cargo and allow for sustained release. Polymeric NPs offer several advantages as therapeutics carriers due to their tunable characteristics like size and shape, ease of manufacturing, and biocompatibility. Despite this, there are no polymeric NPs that are approved for treatment of liver diseases. This is surprising since─when administered intravenously─the majority of NPs accumulate in cells in the liver. NP characteristics like size and surface charge can be altered to affect distribution to the liver, and even cellular distribution, but the conjugation of targeting ligands onto the NP surface for specific receptors on the cells is an important approach for enhancing cell specific delivery. Enhancing cell-specific targeting of conjugated NPs in the liver has two major hurdles: 1) avoiding accumulation of NPs in the liver resident macrophages known as Kupffer cells, which are optimized to phagocytose particulates, and 2) overcoming the transport barriers associated with architectural changes of the diseased liver. To identify the structures and mechanisms most important in NP design, NP administration during ex vivo perfusion (EVP)─achieved by anatomically isolating an organ by perfusing it outside the body─may be the most important and efficient approach. However, EVP is currently underutilized in the NP field, with limited research published on NPs delivered during liver EVP, and therefore representing an opportunity for future investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.