Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40127197›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2025

Temporal constraints on leaf-level trait plasticity for next-generation land surface models.

A Odé, N G Smith, K T Rebel, H J de Boer

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A OdéEnvironmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0672-9535
N G SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, 2901 Main St, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7048-4387
K T RebelEnvironmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1722-3935
H J de BoerEnvironmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6933-344X

Funding

US National Science Foundation DEB-2045968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsDynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) are essential for quantifying the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the Earth's climate system, but struggle with uncertainty and complexity. Eco-evolutionary optimality (EEO) theory provides a promising approach to improve DGVMs based on the premise that leaf carbon gain is optimized with resource costs. However, the timescales at which plant traits can adjust to environmental changes have not yet been systematically incorporated in EEO-based models. Our aims were to identify temporal constraints on key leaf photosynthetic and leaf functional traits, and develop a conceptual framework for incorporation of temporal leaf trait dynamics in EEO-based models.

methodsWe reviewed the scientific literature on temporal responses of leaf traits associated with stomata and hydraulics, photosynthetic biochemistry, and morphology and lifespan. Subsequent response times were categorized from fast to slow considering physiological, phenotypic (acclimation) and evolutionary (adaptation) mechanisms. We constructed a conceptual framework including several key leaf traits identified from the literature review. We considered temporal separation of dynamics in the leaf interior to atmospheric CO2 concentration (ci:ca) from the optimal ci:ca ratio [χ(optimal)] and dynamics in stomatal conductance within the constraint of the anatomical maximum stomatal conductance (gsmax). A proof-of-concept was provided by modelling temporally separated responses in these trait combinations to CO2 and humidity. KEY

resultsWe identified 17 leaf traits crucial for EEO-based modelling and determined their response mechanisms and timescales. Physiological and phenotypic response mechanisms were considered most relevant for modelling EEO-based trait dynamics, while evolutionary constraints limit response ranges. Our conceptual framework demonstrated an approach to separate near-instantaneous physiological responses in ci:ca from week-scale phenotypic responses in χ(optimal), and to separate minute-scale physiological responses in stomatal conductance from annual-scale phenotypic responses in gsmax.

conclusionsWe highlight an opportunity to constrain leaf trait dynamics in EEO-based models based on physiological, phenotypic and evolutionary response mechanisms.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPlant LeavesBiological EvolutionCarbon DioxideEcosystemPhotosynthesisPlant StomataTime FactorsCarbon Dioxideeco-evolutionary optimalityecophysiologyleaf functional traitsleaf gas exchangeleaf hydraulicsphenotypic plasticityphotosynthesisphotosynthetic capacitystomatal conductancetimescalesVegetation modelling

Identifiers

PMID40127197
PMCPMC12445853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.