ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Relational similarity-based graph contrastive learning for DTI prediction.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced drug-target interaction prediction using convolutional graph attention networks in expert systems.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- SynerDTI: a synergistic deep learning framework for drug-target interaction prediction via global feature coordinated attention mechanism.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- MoleProLink-RL: geometric transport for domain-policy reinforcement learning in drug-target interaction prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As part of the drug repurposing process, it is imperative to predict the interactions between drugs and target proteins in an accurate and efficient manner. With the introduction of contrastive learning into drug-target prediction, the accuracy of drug repurposing will be further improved. However, a large part of DTI prediction methods based on deep learning either focus only on the structural features of proteins and drugs extracted using GNN or CNN, or focus only on their relational features extracted using heterogeneous graph neural networks on a DTI heterogeneous graph. Since the structural and relational features of proteins and drugs describe their attribute information from different perspectives, their combination can improve DTI prediction performance. We propose a relational similarity-based graph contrastive learning for DTI prediction (RSGCL-DTI), which combines the structural and relational features of drugs and proteins to enhance the accuracy of DTI predictions. In our proposed method, the inter-protein relational features and inter-drug relational features are extracted from the heterogeneous drug-protein interaction network through graph contrastive learning, respectively. The results demonstrate that combining the relational features obtained by graph contrastive learning with the structural ones extracted by D-MPNN and CNN enhances feature representation ability, thereby improving DTI prediction performance. Our proposed RSGCL-DTI outperforms eight SOTA baseline models on the four benchmark datasets, performs well on the imbalanced dataset, and also shows excellent generalization ability on unseen drug-protein pairs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.