Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40127172›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Topology-based metrics for finding the optimal sparsity in gene regulatory network inference.

Nils Lundqvist, Mateusz Garbulowski, Thomas Hillerton, Erik L L Sonnhammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nils LundqvistDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna 171 21, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0004-7638-5979
Mateusz GarbulowskiDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna 171 21, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2497-194X
Thomas HillertonDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna 171 21, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6362-0659
Erik L L SonnhammerDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna 171 21, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9015-5588

Funding

Swedish Research Council 2019-04095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGene regulatory network (GRN) inference is a complex task aiming to unravel regulatory interactions between genes in a cell. A major shortcoming of most GRN inference methods is that they do not attempt to find the optimal sparsity, i.e. the single best GRN, which is important when applying GRN inference in a real situation. Instead, the sparsity tends to be controlled by an arbitrarily set hyperparameter.

resultsIn this paper, two new methods for predicting the optimal sparsity of GRNs are formulated and benchmarked on simulated perturbation-based gene expression data using four GRN inference methods: LASSO, Zscore, LSCON, and GENIE3. Both sparsity prediction methods are defined using the hypothesis that the topology of real GRNs is scale-free, and are evaluated based on their ability to predict the sparsity of the true GRN. The results show that the new topology-based approaches reliably predict a sparsity close to the true one. This ability is valuable for real-world applications where a single GRN is inferred from real data. In such situations, it is vital to be able to infer a GRN with the correct sparsity. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://bitbucket.org/sonnhammergrni/powerlaw_sparsity/ and https://codeocean.com/capsule/4393635/.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsGene Expression Profiling

Identifiers

PMID40127172
PMCPMC12057811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.