ArticlePloS one2025
Temporal equal and active participation in synchronous collaborative learning: Antecedents and effect for learning.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For teaching 21st century skills, collaborative learning has been increasingly adopted in educational programs nowadays. However, learners often fail to engage in effective collaboration, which severely deteriorates learning gains. To develop support tools for collaborative learning, participation is one of the promising aspects considering its effect on learning gains and its viability for real-time measurement in modern learning environments. This study quantitatively and qualitatively examined the relationship between temporal equal and active participation and learning gains in synchronous collaboration. Our data included 10 teams that collaboratively learn analogical thinking in university coursework. Our result demonstrated the positive relationship between temporal equal and active participation and team learning gains. Detailed observation revealed that equal and active participation often reflected joint information processing which in turn affected learning gains, although this relationship depends on the discussion contents. The effect could be direct, indirect or absent depending on discussion topics and other factors. Our comparative analysis also proposed three antecedents for equal and active participation; maintaining a shared understanding of what to discuss and why to discuss, critical comments for extending discussion, and arguing without completion. We lastly summarized our theoretical implications for equal and active participation and practical implications for supporting collaborative learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.