ArticlePloS one2025
Brain tumor intelligent diagnosis based on Auto-Encoder and U-Net feature extraction.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning-based models for preoperative prediction of pituitary adenoma consistency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Pooled it
- Comparing Handcrafted Radiomics Versus Latent Deep Learning Features of Admission Head CT for Hemorrhagic Stroke Outcome Prediction.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preoperative classification of brain tumors is critical to developing personalized treatment plans, however existing classification methods rely on manual intervention and often have problems with efficiency and accuracy, which may lead to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis in clinical practice and affect the therapeutic effect. We propose a fully automated approach to brain tumor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classification, consisted by a feature extractor based on the improved U-Net and a classifier based on convolutional recurrent neural network (CRNN). The encoder of the feature extractor based on dense block, is used to enhance feature propagation and reduce the number of parameters. The decoder uses residual block to reduce the weight of some features for improving the effect of MRI spatial sequence reconstruction, and avoid gradient disappearance. Skip connections between the encoder and the decoder effectively merge low-level features and high-level features. The extract feature sequence is input into the CRNN-based classifier for final classification. We assessed the performance of our method for grading glioma, glioma isocitrate dehydrogenase1 (IDH1) mutation status classification and pituitary tumor texture classification on two datasets, glioma or pituitary tumors collected in a local affiliated hospital and glioma imaging data from TCIA. Compared with commonly models and new models, our model achieves higher accuracy, with an accuracy of 90.72%, classified glioma IDH1 mutation status with an accuracy of 94.35%, and classified pituitary tumor texture with an accuracy of 94.64%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.