ArticlePloS one2025
The Healthy Minds, Thriving Kids Project: Educator perspectives on relevance and potential impact of a mental health skill building program.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthy Minds Thriving Kids (HMTK) is a free to user mental health skill building program developed by the Child Mind Institute with the aim to normalize conversations about emotional health and provide educators with wellness tools. The aim of this study was to explore the applicability of the HMTK program for universal school-based delivery from the perspective of educators, specifically to understand acceptability of program materials, perception of the quality of the program, and impressions of the program's usefulness and relevance across K-12 settings.
methodsThe HMTK program was available to view by educator registrants between 01/26/2022 and 09/07/2022 in the State of California. Educator participants viewed an introductory video for the program and a minimum of two skills videos before participating in an online survey.
resultsOf 68,861 registrants to the website, 64,376 provided survey data. Post-pandemic levels of stress and anxiety were increased, and 89.5% of respondents said young people required a greater degree of support than in the past. Almost all educators (90%) endorsed a need for additional mental health skill building tools for students, and following review of HMTK, > 80% of respondents said they would use the program in their classrooms. Most (86.6%) found the program engaging, and 85.1% found the program relevant to and representative of their student cohorts. More than three quarters (79.6%) said their students would find the program engaging and beneficial. Post-exposure to HMTK, 18.8% more educators believed that the State of California was committed to supporting students' emotional learning.
conclusionThis survey demonstrates that from the perspective of educators the HMTK program is a valuable and complementary resource to school curricula to improve the mental health skills of young people. It provides an easy-to-implement framework that school districts and administrators can integrate within their curriculum planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.